Does circumcision alter the periurethral bacterial flora?

By S S Wijesinha, B L Atkins, N E Dudley and P K Tam.

Originally published in the journal: Pediatric surgery international (citation at foot of page).

Abstract

A prospective study of 25 boys who underwent circumcision for medical reason was performed. Specimens of periurethral bacterial flora were taken before operation as well as 3 weeks after surgery, so that each boy acted as his own control. Before circumcision, 13 (52%) harboured uropathogenic organisms (Escherichia coli and other coliforms, Enterococcus spp, Proteus spp, Pseudomonas spp, and Klebsiella spp); after circumcision, none of the boys had uropathogens, the only organisms cultured from the periurethral region being skin commensals. We postulate that circumcision converts a 'cul-de-sac' that is a reservoir of organisms capable of causing ascending urinary tract infection into a surface colonised by natural skin organisms. This study provides circumstantial evidence supporting the idea that circumcision in well-selected patients may confer protection from urine infection.

Citation: Wijesinha SS, Atkins BL, Dudley NE, Tam PK. Does circumcision alter the periurethral bacterial flora? Pediatr Surg Int. 1998 Mar; 13 (2-3): 146–8.

Library topics: All articles (previous, next), Bacteria (previous, next), Urinary tract infection (previous, next).

Other sources for this article: PubMed.

File: 'Library/Wijesinha'. Last updated: March 14 2011, 21:34:35 GMT.